Martin (1992: 544-5):
The activity sequences generated by the discourses of humanities, social science and especially science tend to be logical rather than sequential — if/then or so then rather than and then. It is for this reasons [sic] that scientific sequences (e.g. how it rains) are referred to as implication sequences in Wignell et al. (1987/1990), Shea (1988) and Martin (1990).
Blogger Comments:
[1] In this modelling of field, in this instance, 'activity sequences' now refers to the language realising fields, rather than to non-linguistic behaviours (see previous post) or to the contextual fields that are realised in language. The confusion is thus stratificational.
[2] 'Logical vs sequential' is a false dichotomy. Leaving aside the fact that, in SFL theory, 'sequence' refers to two or more figures related logically through expansion or projection, the relations here are all logical:
[2] 'Logical vs sequential' is a false dichotomy. Leaving aside the fact that, in SFL theory, 'sequence' refers to two or more figures related logically through expansion or projection, the relations here are all logical:
- if…then construes a hypotactic logical relation of expansion: enhancement: condition;
- so then construes a logical relation of expansion: enhancement;
- and then construes a paratactic logical relation of expansion: enhancement: temporal.
