Martin (1992: 586):
… it demonstrates that […] the coding orientations associated with class, gender, ethnicity and generation focus attitudes in systematic ways. Affect is in other words ideologically addressed (see Martin 1986 on the orientation of attitude in ecological debates) and exploring this projection of interpersonal meaning is an important dimension of semiotic space.
Blogger Comments:
[1] This continues the misconstrual of Bernstein's coding orientation as ideology.
[2] This continues the confusion of affect, as a dimension of tenor (context stratum), with affect as interpersonal meaning (semantics stratum). Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 33) refer to the contextual system as 'sociometric rôles'.
[3] This stratal confusion is aided by the blurring of two distinct meanings of 'projection':
[3] This stratal confusion is aided by the blurring of two distinct meanings of 'projection':
- tenor as the theoretical "projection" of the interpersonal metafunction onto the context stratum;
- interpersonal meaning as the verbal projection of speakers.
[4] Trivially, 'exploring' is not a dimension.
exploring this projection of interpersonal meaning
|
is
|
an important dimension of semiotic space
|
Identified / Token
|
Process
|
Identifier / Value
|
